Methodology of Accuracy Assessment

The accuracy assessment method involved evaluating the impact of signals provided by the AI Assistant within the subsequent 3-hour timeframe. For instance, if the AI Assistant recommended buying, the research team examined how many times the signal led to a higher price within the next 3 hours, observing at 10-minute intervals. This process allowed for the calculation of accuracy specific to that time interval.

To ensure a more reliable estimation, the assessment was conducted multiple times to reduce the impact of randomness. The research team repeated the evaluation process several times, gathering more data points, and then averaged all the obtained accuracies to calculate a more precise overall accuracy.

This assessment was carried out for all coins and across three levels of risk appetite. Additionally, the research team examined the signal resources most frequently suggested by the AI Assistant. It was observed that our system often received signals for a particular coin from the AI, possibly due to higher confidence in those signals. Alternatively, the AI Assistant may have prioritized signals from social resources for certain coins, as they showed a higher correlation with the movement of those specific coins.

The test period for this assessment was from 5th July to 7th July, during which the described methodology was applied to analyze the accuracy and signal resource preferences of the AI Assistant.

Overall Accuracy

Based on the research conducted in July 2023, the average accuracy of the AI Assistant among different user risk profiles for various coins was as follows:

- For Cautious users, the average accuracy of the Signals among all coins was 63.66%.
- For Balanced users, the average accuracy of the Signals among all coins was 63.16%.
- For Adventurous users, the average accuracy of the Signals among all coins was 66.06%.

Detailed Accuracy Assessment

The detailed accuracy assessment for different coins and user risk profiles is as follows:

Coin Risk App Accuracy Attended Features
ADA Cautious 64.07% Mostly attended Technical Indicators
ADA Balanced 59.93% Mostly attended Technical Indicators
ADA Adventurous 60.18% Mostly attended Technical Indicators
BNB Cautious 56.81% Mostly attended Technical Indicators
BNB Balanced 55.14% Mostly attended Technical Indicators
BNB Adventurous 59.03% Mostly attended Technical Indicators
BTC Cautious 63.21% Mostly attended Technical Indicators
BTC Balanced 65.23% Mostly attended Technical Indicators
BTC Adventurous 64.11% Mostly attended Technical Indicators
DOGE Cautious 65.21% Mostly attended Technical Indicators
DOGE Balanced 61.79% Mostly attended Technical Indicators
DOGE Adventurous 61.79% Mostly attended Technical Indicators
DOT Cautious 78.67% The coin behavior was based on social news
DOT Balanced 91.03% Mostly attended On-chain features
DOT Adventurous 91.03% The price predictions were well
ETH Cautious 60.88% Mostly attended Technical Indicators
ETH Balanced 61.43% Mostly attended Technical Indicators
ETH Adventurous 61.99% The price predictions were well
LTC Cautious 66.43% Mostly attended Technical Indicators
LTC Balanced 55.32% The coin behavior was based on social news
LTC Adventurous 67.19% The price predictions were well
SOL Cautious 77.75% The price predictions were well
SOL Balanced 70.08% Mostly attended Technical Indicators
SOL Adventurous 72.08% Mostly attended Technical Indicators
XRP Cautious 48.04% The coin behavior was based on social news
XRP Balanced 46.37% The coin behavior was based on social news
XRP Adventurous 58.6% The price predictions were well
TRX Balanced 65.32% The price predictions were well
TRX Adventurous 64.65% The coin behavior was based on social news
TRX Cautious 55.56% The coin behavior was based on social news